USCIS Extends Flexibility for Responding to Agency Requests
In response to the ongoing coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has announced it is extending the flexibilities it announced on March 30, 2020, to assist applicants, petitioners and requestors who are responding to certain:
Requests for Evidence;
Continuations to Request Evidence (N-14);
Notices of Intent to Deny;
Notices of Intent to Revoke;
Notices of Intent to Rescind;
Notices of Intent to Terminate regional centers; and
Motions to Reopen an N-400 Pursuant to 8 CFR 335.5, Receipt of Derogatory Information After Grant.
In addition, USCIS will consider a Form I-290B, Notice of Appeal or Motion or Form N-336, Request for a Hearing on a Decision in Naturalization Proceedings (Under Section 336 of the INA), if:
The form was filed up to 60 calendar days from the issuance of a USCIS decision; and
USCIS made that decision anytime from March 1, 2020, through June 30, 2021.
Notice/Request/Decision Issuance Date: This flexibility applies to the above documents if the issuance date listed on the request, notice or decision is between March 1, 2020, and June 30, 2021, inclusive of those dates.
Response Due Date: USCIS will consider a response to the above requests and notices received within 60 calendar days after the response due date set in the request or notice before taking any action. Additionally, USCIS will consider a Form N-336 or Form I-290B received up to 60 calendar days from the date of the decision before they take any action.
USCIS Announces Lockbox Filing Flexibilities
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has announced that it will continue to offer filing flexibilities to provide relief to certain applicants and petitioners impacted by delays at a USCIS lockbox. These flexibilities only apply to benefit requests submitted to a USCIS lockbox and not to USCIS service centers or field offices. The following temporary flexibilities are effective for 60 days from June 10 until Aug. 9, 2021:
If you submitted a benefit request to a USCIS lockbox between October 1, 2020, and April 1, 2021, and that request was rejected during that timeframe solely due to a filing fee payment that expired while the benefit request was awaiting processing, you may resubmit the request with a new fee payment. If USCIS concurs that it has rejected the benefit request because of the delay, USCIS will deem the request to have been received on the initial filing date it was first received and waive the $30 dishonored check fee.
USCIS will allow applicants and petitioners to submit documentation with a benefit request resubmission demonstrating that because of the time that elapsed between when a benefit request was originally submitted to a USCIS lockbox and when USCIS rejected it, an applicant, co-applicant, beneficiary or derivative has reached an age that makes them no longer eligible to file for the benefit requested. If USCIS agrees that the delayed rejection caused the person to be ineligible due to age, USCIS will accept the request and deem it to have been received on the date the initial benefit request was received. This flexibility does not apply to Form N-600K, Application for Citizenship and Issuance of Certificate Under Section 322.
Applicants and petitioners can contact USCIS to verify previously filed benefit requests have not been rejected in error. If USCIS agrees, applicants and petitioners may be allowed to resubmit an erroneously rejected benefit request and USCIS will deem the benefit request to have been received on the date the initial benefit request was first received at a USCIS lockbox.
We’re Hiring!
We have a job opening for a paralegal position with our dynamic team. Please share this posting (Immigration Paralegal) with your networks, and please let them know that we are also accepting resumes and cover letters at: careers@iandoli.com.
Eoin Reilly Retirement Announcement
After over 30+ years with Iandoli Desai and Cronin P.C., having contributed an enormous amount to the firm’s growth and success during that time, our good friend and colleague, Eoin Reilly, will be retiring on June 18th. We’ll miss him greatly, but we’re excited for him as he embarks on this next chapter. While Eoin will retire from active practice with our firm, he plans to keep his legal skills sharp through regular pro bono work with the Rian Immigrant Center in the years to come. Eoin is also looking forward to dedicating time to traveling abroad, visiting with family and friends, studying things like film and art history, cooking, and achieving his lifelong goal of having a beer belly (such a good place to rest a beverage!). Please join us in raising a pint to thank Eoin for his untold hours of hard work, his compassion and kindness, and his wonderful sense of humor. Here’s to many good retirement memories yet to be made!
DHS Secretary Announces New 18-month TPS Designation for Haiti
After many months of uncertainty and four separate lawsuits challenging the Trump administration’s efforts to eliminate the previous designation of Haitian TPS, we are very happy to share that DHS Secretary Mayorkas has announced a new 18-month designation of TPS for individuals from Haiti.
This designation will allow Haitian nationals who are currently residing in the U.S. as of May 21, 2021, to file initial applications for TPS as long as they meet the eligibility requirements. We are still awaiting the publication of the Federal Register notice which will contain the duration dates, eligibility requirements, and application instructions.
With respect to the previous designation of Haitian TPS, court injunctions and other court rulings have allowed it to remain in effect, however, we are still awaiting the outcome of those lawsuits. Existing TPS beneficiaries retain their TPS and employment authorization through October 4, 2021. DHS will continue to extend the benefits and documents as required to comply with court orders. These beneficiaries may also apply for the new designation of Haitian TPS so as to benefit from the new 18-month designation.
For more information, please see the USCIS webpage dedicated to Haitian TPS: https://www.uscis.gov/humanitarian/temporary-protected-status/temporary-protected-status-designated-country-haiti. If you have additional questions about applying for TPS, please contact Iandoli, Desai, and Cronin P.C. (info@iandoli.com) to schedule a consultation.
Federal Register Notice Published Designating Burma/Myanmar for Temporary Protected Status
The notice designating Burma/Myanmar for Temporary Protected Status (TPS) was published in the federal register. This notice designates Burma/Myanmar for TPS for 18 months, from May 25, 2021, to November 25, 2022. This designation allows eligible nationals from Burma/Myanmar who have continuously resided in the U.S. since March 11, 2021, and who have been continuously physically present in the U.S. since May 25, 2021, to apply for TPS. This will provide protection from deportation along with the opportunity to apply for work authorization during those 18 months. For those individuals who were or are also in F-1 status, there has been a suspension of certain regulations related to limitations on the number of hours students from Burma/Myanmar may work during this same time period. (Please see previous update regarding the suspension of certain requirements for F-1 students from Burma/Myanmar.)
For more information, please see the USCIS webpage dedicated to Burmese TPS: https://www.uscis.gov/humanitarian/temporary-protected-status/temporary-protected-status-designated-country-burma-myanmar. If you have additional questions about applying for TPS, please contact Iandoli, Desai, and Cronin P.C. (info@iandoli.com) to schedule a consultation.
Suspension of Requirements Governing Employment for F-1 Students from Burma/Myanmar
Due to the humanitarian crisis in Burma/Myanmar, the Secretary of Homeland Security has suspended certain regulatory requirements for F-1 nonimmigrant students from Burma/Myanmar who are experiencing severe economic hardship. These students may request work authorization, work additional hours while school is in session, and reduce their course load. This change in policy became effective on May 25, 2021, and will remain in effect until November 25, 2022, which coincides with the period of time for which Burma/Myanmar has been designated for Temporary Protected Status (TPS) (see update on TPS). Please see this notice from DHS for more information: https://studyinthestates.dhs.gov/2021/05/dhs-issues-special-student-relief-for-f-1-international-students-from-burma.
National Interest Exception for F, M, and certain J visa holders for the coming school year
As noted in a previous segment of our newsletter, on May 27, 2021, the US Department of State announced a new national interest determination made by the Secretary of State. Students and certain academics subject to Presidential Proclamations 9984, 9992, and 10143 (related to the spread of COVID-19) who have been present in China, Iran, Brazil, South Africa, or India, may now qualify for a National Interest Exception (“NIE”). They will only for an NIE if their academic program begins August 1, 2021 or later. Derivative family members accompanying a noncitizen who has been granted or would be reasonably expected to receive an NIE, and who is engaging in certain types of long-term employment, studies, or research lasting four weeks or more, also qualify for an exception.
Students with valid F-1 and M-1 visas who plan to begin or continue an academic program, including optional practical training (“OPT”), starting August 1, 2021 or later do not need to contact an embassy or consulate to travel. They may enter the United States no earlier than 30 days before the start of their academic program. Students seeking to apply for new F-1 or M-1 visas should check the status of visa services at the nearest embassy or consulate; those applicants who are found to be otherwise qualified for an F-1 or M-1 visa will automatically be considered for an NIE to travel.
(Link to DOS announcement: https://travel.state.gov/content/travel/en/News/visas-news/national-interest-exceptions-for-certain-travelers-from-china-Iran-india-brazil-south-africa-schengen-area-united-kingdom-and-ireland.html)
DOL Further Delay of Effective Date of Final Rule on Computation of Prevailing Wage Levels
As noted by NAFSA, on January 14, 2021, the Department of Labor (“DOL”) under the Trump administration published the final rule “Strengthening Wage Protections for the Temporary and Permanent Employment of Certain Aliens in the United States.” This was a response to federal courts having set aside the October 8, 2020 interim final rule with the same name.
This final rule will change how DOL computes Level I through Level IV wage rates when it uses Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS) wage date to make a National Prevailing Wage Center (NPWC) prevailing wage determination or to certify an LCA that relies on OES wage data. This would raise the prevailing wage determinations in each OEWS-based wage level.
The implementation of this rule was delayed on March 12, 2021, and has recently been delayed again. On May 12, 2021, DOL published a final rule stating that the effective date would be further delayed until November 14, 2022, and the corresponding phased transitions dates have been delayed until January 1, 2023, January 1, 2023, January 1, 2025, and January 1, 2026, respectively.
(Link to Department of Labor final rule: https://www.aila.org/infonet/dol-further-delay-of-effective-date-of-final-rule)
Final Rule Implementing Vacatur of Interim Final Rule Which Revised Definition of Specialty Occupation
In good news for high-skilled foreign workers who would like to apply for H-1B visas in the future, a final rule was published on May 19, 2021, removing the interim final rule “Strengthening the H-1B Nonimmigrant Visa Classification Program” after it had been vacated by a federal district court.
This interim final rule was issued under the Trump administration without a notice and comment period and would have had an incredibly negative impact on the H-1B process. Specifically, this rule would have overhauled the H-1B visa program by requiring employers to pay H-1B workers much higher wages, tightening the restrictions on the types of degrees that could qualify an applicant, and shortening the length of the visa for certain types of workers. According to a senior official in the Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”) at the time, this change would have meant the rejection of about one-third of H-1B applications.
However, on December 1, 2020, in Chamber of Commerce, et al., v. DHS et al., the US District Court for the Northern District of California court found that the defendants had failed to show that there was good cause to avoid the Administrative Procedure’s Act’s notice and comment requirements. Consequently, the court set aside the DHS interim final rule “Strengthening the H-1B Nonimmigrant Visa Classification Program.” Based on this ruling, the Biden administration recently published a final rule restoring the regulatory text relating to the definition of a H-1B visas to appear as it did before the publication of the interim final rule.

